Rock the Vote

[dbodenheim]

Get on over to the suggestions forum and Vote on the cs_compound/de_port suggestion guys. Cmon fellas, want to get this implemented quickly. :) ( or at least spark some pro/con debate)

[Saur]

Live by the AWP, die by the ... well, don't die w/ an awp :P

I vote AWP enabled across the board!


<3 Saur

[wihadmin]

Realize that Saur can go 60/3 with an AWP....

[Vryllyn]

I've never been afraid of AWPers. They miss and they die.

[alittlegirl]

Hmm awp vs mac10, I think the top of my skull is gonna be flying off more than usual.

Is it possible to limit the amount of awp's taken in a round per team to say 1 or perhaps 2 per team? Else it would be rather dull as the more powerful rifles limit player mobility around the map.

/me hates being a 1 trick pony...but that trick sure is fun

[snizel_88]

Realize that Saur can go 60/3 with an AWP....

Thats y AWP should not be allowed, certain very accurate pple (saur) can take out an entire team as it is, give them a gun that powerful and it's gunna be pertty lobsided. AWP are just too powerful no matter how realistic.

[bman65]

I vote for allowing the AWP. It is not that bad once you get used to it. It is also expensive so you won't see people buying these every round or that early. Also it is not that great due to the bad accuracy while moving. The mistake most people make is trying to rush an AWPer by themselves. If you have a team of people (or a flashbang/smoke) their AWP is negated and almost useless.

bman

[Saur]

The mistake most people make is trying to rush an AWPer by themselves. If you have a team of people (or a flashbang/smoke) their AWP is negated and almost useless.

Obi Wan once thought as you do...

<3 Saur